Cardinality-constrained optimization problems are notoriously hard to solve both in theory and practice. However, as famous examples such as the sparse portfolio optimization and best subset selection problems show, this class is extremely important in real-world applications. In this paper, we apply a penalty alternating direction method to these problems. The key idea is to split the problem along its discrete-continuous structure to obtain two subproblems that are much easier to solve than the original problem. In addition, the coupling between these subproblems is achieved via a classic penalty framework. The method can be seen as a primal heuristic for which convergence results are readily available from the literature. In our extensive computational study, we first show that the method is competitive to a commercial MIP solver for the portfolio optimization problem. On these instances, we also test a variant of our approach that uses a perspective reformulation of the problem. Regarding the best subset selection problem, it turns out that our method significantly outperforms commercial solvers and that it is at least competitive to state-of-the-art methods from the literature.
View An Alternating Method for Cardinality-Constrained Optimization: A Computational Study for the Best Subset Selection and Sparse Portfolio Problems